Displaced Gazans: rebuild or recover — and either way, the right to come back
For those who stay: dignified interim housing while Gaza is rebuilt, and then a permanent home, in a Gaza that is demilitarised — no weapons, on any side of that line. Rebuilding is the default and the obligation, and it is what most people want. For anyone who would rather not spend the rebuilding years inside a construction site, we support a funded alternative: a year of restorative travel and trauma treatment, and sponsors who commit not to a plane ticket but to long-term integration — housing, work and support for life — in a country that genuinely wants to receive them, with the standing of a person who chose to come rather than a person who was placed. And the condition without which none of the second track exists: every person who leaves keeps a documented, guaranteed right to return, and the property claim that comes with it. A year away is a sabbatical, not a surrender of your home. Departure without a right of return is not voluntary migration, it is transfer, and we oppose transfer. We will not support any version of this that quietly drops the return clause.